223 Remington is an adequate deer cartridge is this: It depends. I think the best answer to the question as to whether the. We also have to contend with more wind, and wind affects lighter bullets far more substantially than heavier. Ranges tend to be longer as well, especially on the wide-open plains and in the Rocky Mountains. Out here in the west where I live, the deer average a bit heavier-perhaps 150 pounds would be a reasonable average, and there are plenty of bucks weighing more than 200 pounds. Too, the deer in the east-while a buck can occasionally weigh 200 pounds-tend to be much smaller. 223 Remington is an adequate deer cartridge. Since the vast majority of his whitetail hunting occurs in the east where he says a long shot is 150 yards, it would seem from that perspective that the. That velocity threshold occurs at some point just this side of 200 yards. 223 bullet gets down to 2,400 fps or less, however, that it will lose much of its authority. The wound cavities I have seen in ballistic gelatin are much bigger than those from a. 223 the bullet can be as much as 900 fps faster, depending on the range. ![]() 30-30 bullet is going to hit a deer at 2,200 fps or less. “It’s because of the velocity difference,” he said. 223 with a strong bullet are better than a typical 150-grain. Richard does a lot of research using ballistic gelatin and claims the wound cavities from a. 223 is a fine deer cartridge.” I pressed him regarding the range these deer he has taken or seen taken were shot. “Given a good bullet like a 63-grain Nosler Partition or Barnes TSX, the. 223 and seen a similar number shot by others. Richard Mann is a gun writer out of West Virginia, and he has shot somewhere around a dozen whitetails with a. 223 Remington/5.56 NATO cartridge an adequate deer cartridge? I had some pre-conceived notions regarding this but no first-hand experience, so I checked with someone who did. I’m sure that there were some old geezers around after World War I who thought these young whippersnappers coming back and hunting deer with bolt-action repeaters were unfair. decimate the game herd or leave a lot of wounded animals to die slow, painful deaths-who am I, or anyone else, to say they are wrong?įinally, we also need to accept the fact that lever- and bolt-action rifles-even single shots-were once primary rifles of the military. As long as what they are doing does not adversely impact the resource-i.e. They get a charge out of using cutting-edge technology in the field. However, I am also acutely aware that many shooters and hunters prefer to use the latest in technology. My tastes run more toward blue steel and walnut. In the interest of full disclosure, I’ll state up front that I am a more traditional soul. But there are those who want to infuse the AR platform-as well as other semi-auto rifles-into the hunting world. ![]() As for me, I make no apologies for owning some AR-style rifles-some I use for sporting purposes others are here for self-defense. Because of the so-called “Assault Weapon” ban of the 1990s there has been a lot of froth put forth about what is and isn’t a sporting rifle. Since this is my 223rd blog, I thought I’d say something regarding the.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |